This edition presents Geoffrey Chaucer's Middle English translation of Boethius's De Consolatione Philosophiae, edited by Richard Morris for the Early English Text Society in 1868. The text is collated from British Museum Additional MS 10,340 and Cambridge University Library MS Ii.3.21, with variant readings recorded in linenotes. The edition includes an introduction, index of first lines, a tabula, the translation with apparatus, a verse appendix, and a glossarial index. Morris's editorial work preserves the orthographic peculiarities of the manuscripts, including yogh (ȝ) and thorn (þ), and notes scribal corrections and marginalia.

Manuscript Collation and Textual Apparatus

The edition's linenotes record variants between the two primary manuscripts, often noting where the Cambridge MS (C) differs from the base text. For example, at line 3850, the note records that the base MS reads 'now' while C has 'þou most suffren'. Such details reveal the scribes' interventions and the fluidity of the textual tradition. Morris also marks conjectural emendations, such as inserting '[what]' from C at line 3829. The apparatus includes unexplained sigla like 'H.', which Skeat identified as MS Harley 2421, and occasional Greek phrases such as 'ἕπου Θεῷ' in the sidenotes. This apparatus allows readers to trace the editorial decisions behind the printed text.

Chaucer's Middle English and Boethian Philosophy

Chaucer's translation renders Boethius's Latin prose and verse into a Middle English that blends philosophical precision with vernacular idiom. In the excerpt, the phrase 'þe deuyne purueaunce' (divine providence) is glossed in the margin as 'as who seiþ no þing nis wiþouten ordinaunce'. The translation often expands the Latin, as when 'while he hastiþ to wiþhalden þe þinges þat he haþ maked in to hys semblaunce' is followed by a clarifying paraphrase: 'þat is to seyn forto wiþholden þinges in to good'. This dual presentation—text and gloss—mirrors Boethius's own dialogic structure, where Philosophy instructs the prisoner through reasoned argument and poetic interludes.

Orthographic and Typographic Features

The text preserves archaic letterforms: yogh (ȝ) appears in words like 'ȝit' (yet) and 'ȝif' (if), while thorn (þ) represents both voiced and voiceless 'th'. The printer's inability to set these letters is noted in the front matter, and they are formatted to match surrounding text. The edition also marks scribal abbreviations, such as the tilde over 'ũ' in 'ũfolden' (unfolden). In the appendix, decorative final letters are approximated with symbols like ')' and '+', as in 'sprong +'. These features give the reader a sense of the manuscript's visual texture, though the e-text regularizes line numbers and page breaks for clarity.

Readers approaching this edition should attend to the linenotes and glossarial index, which illuminate Chaucer's lexical choices and the scribal transmission of the text. The dual presentation—first with full apparatus, then as a clean text—allows for both scholarly study and uninterrupted reading. Morris's edition remains a foundational resource for understanding how Chaucer adapted Boethius's late antique philosophy for a fourteenth-century English audience.